vlaw
said on February 17, 2015
Is it just me or was this episode heavily edited? In several places Kaiser's voice quality changes drastically and bits seem to be spliced in or truncated. Also, a bit shorter than a typical Sinica episode. Still an interesting episode, but these things were a bit distracting.Just some constructive criticism. Keep up the good work.
trevelyan
said on February 17, 2015
@vlaw,Yeah. The original show was around 45 minutes long, but the bits that were cut were largely inaudible, or responses to something that was inaudible, due to problems with Kaiser's microphone.Unfortunately, but it felt better running the show in its edited form than cutting it completely.--dave
vlaw
said on February 17, 2015
I see. In the past, when technical problems like that arose, I recall hearing Kaiser make a note of it when introducing the show, as well as a note on the page for that episode. That would have been nice. Thanks.
lambo
said on February 18, 2015
No disrespect, but having already read both the books Palmer cites, "Anxious Wealth" (2013) and "Red Lights" (2009), I struggled to find anything very original about his article "The Bro Code", competently written though it was. All these annecdotes about KTV girls, massage parlours, hotel call-girls (accompanied by the usual sniggers) now have an embarrassingly shop-worn feel. Not quite sure why this merited a show.
sinnernerious
said on February 23, 2015
Kaiser, When are we going to get Eric X Li You mentioned in the past about potentially having him sometime in the future.There was a new talk of his on Political Systems few weeks back at the Fullerton Lecture. www.iiss.org/en/iiss voices/blogsections/iiss-voices-2015-dda3/february-04dc/eric-li-0cb6 He does very few talks, articles and even less interviews (if at all). You should be getting him. He is perfect for the show, controversial, unconventional, thought provoking, targeted at the English speaking audience, etc etc