Judging from the explosive reaction to her recent Wall Street Journal editorial, it's clear that Amy Chua's memoir "Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother" has set off a storm of controversy over the appropriateness of "Chinese parenting" in America. Or even China for that matter. Yet at the same time, the attempted assassination of Gabrielle Giffords in Arizona last week is getting equally vocal denunciations in the Chinese press, especially from critics of American democratization.Today on Sinica, Kaiser Kuo, Jeremy Goldkorn and Gady Epstein delve into both subjects with Sinica newcomers Sheila Melvin, China journalist and author of a recent book on Western classical music in China, and Adrienne Mong, who you may know as producer for NBC News in Beijing. This is the episode where our childhood skeletons all come out of the closet, so listen in as everyone shares their horror stories about what it can mean to grow up Chinese in America, and Gady and Jeremy do their best to fit in anyway.Care to download Sinica to your mp3 player each week automatically? Subscribe to the show by creating an account on Popup Chinese, or manually by opening iTunes, selecting the option "Subscribe to Podcast" from the Advanced menu and copying the URL http://popupchinese.com/feeds/custom/sinica into the box when prompted. You are also welcome to download this mp3 directly from Popup Chinese as a standalone mp3 file and share it with friends. Enjoy!
geroi_asfalta
said on January 15, 2011
This story was blown out of proportion, and the media,as usually, has created controversy where there isn't. Kids do need some level of "healthy" strictness, which must be differentiated from abusive strictness(the last one is the one who undermines so many people).
Also, there is a stab against this style of parenting as "chinese", bringing in the ethnic and racial controversy there. I think it tells more about those 5thouthand commentators who post negative stuff, rather than about Chua.Oh, and by the way, last time i checked it was 5748 comments there. I come from ukrainian-russian family, and it is quite normal thing motivating kids in the way Chua described.
And i think Chua uses some satire and exaggeration, and smiles at some of the stereotypes. The people should loosen up, and look at the piece again. I guess some of the commentators on WSJ have not even read the piece, only heard how “horrible” it is. Everybody should just chill!
geroi_asfalta
said on January 15, 2011
Also there are some responses to her essay
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703959104576081873998873948.html?KEYWORDS=AMY+CHUA
I kind of liked Kelvim Mao's response, that understanding what parents went through, might understand what motivated them to adopt this or that kind of parenting style
trevelyan
said on January 15, 2011
@geroi_asfalta,
Thanks for the link. I accidentally stumbled upon but really liked Adam Minter's review of the book at Shanghai Scrap if you haven't read it -- the first review that's actually made me think the book is likely to be very good despite the editorial.
And... nearly 6000 comments? Amazing. Hard to fault the WSJ for pushing buttons if they can get this sort of response from it.
--dave
jsuppe
said on January 15, 2011
I'm wondering how old this style of raising children is and how it arose? Is it really just an immigrant phenomenon as Amy Chua seems to suggest? I seriously doubt it. It seems very strong in high-class Taiwan families. I'm guessing it could be especially strong in old high-class families whose ancestors competed seriously in the examination system. In those examinations you probably really did aspire to be perfect. I'm wondering if Amy Chua's family was a Mainland family of this tradition, but I haven't read her book yet. Is it any different among Taiwanese or Hakka in Taiwan whose parents and grandparents went through the Japanese educational system?
ch0ula09
said on January 16, 2011
This was a great and insightful discussion. Though Chua is now retreating from the essay, there is no question it brought attention to her book and the WSJ. Though she may now innocently claim that things were taken of context, I don't think Professor Chua is as stupid as she professes. For her and the Murdoch rag, the ends justified the means.
One thing that was left out of your discussion (no doubt due to time and focus constraints) is the tremendous pressure non-immigrant Chinese face with respect to college entrance exams. The rate of teen suicides must be very high in China, and is most likely a state secret. Tiger parents are not strictly an overseas phenomenon.
barrister
said on January 16, 2011
As choulao9 and geroi point out, it seems as if the book isn't as radical as the editorial and we've all been successfully trolled by the WSJ. That said, I find it interesting that most of the China-trolling I read in the US press rolls the other way, being very pro-American and anti-China ("the China threat", etc.)
This is the first case I can think of where it's really rolled the other way.
ler_shahid
said on January 17, 2011
I support the "Chinese mom" parenting. Based on my experience (I'm Chinese, got my Bachelor degree and PhD in Canada), "Chinese Mom" method is very good for training our kids the hard skills (maths, music, language etc). These skills are very difficult to master for an adult. Thus, by giving our kids the hard-to-get skills early in their lives, and allow them to follow their passion later.
When i was doing my Phd, i used to guide undergrad students of all background. For students, there were a lot of calculation, structured procedure planning involved. i found that i never have to worry about erroneous calculation or "messy" planning among "Asian students". With "non-Asian students", most of the time, they said they can do it, but......i learned to re-check all the calculations.....And, this difference was not the result of being educated in different countries, since most of the "Asian students" were immigrants or children of immigrants but finished high school in Canada.
MK1977
said on January 17, 2011
It's interesting that you mention language as one of your hard skills, because I think it highlights one of the main issues here, that of real motivation for learning and subsequent creativity in use of knowledge. As a teacher of English in China, I know my students have a passive English vocabulary of thousands of words because they have the test scores to prove it...but what use is that when, as I have witnessed again and again, they are unable to form their own basic sentences or answer basic questions in real life situations?
pradhanarvind
said on January 18, 2011
Did anyone notice that Cài Měi'ér does not seem to know the difference between the correct use of a and the? Her book is called Battle hymns of the tiger mother. In her TV interview I heard her saying clearly that the book is one woman's narrative on how she raised her kids and not a prescription for everybody. That being the case, the book should be called Battle hymns of a tiger mother.
But then do most Americnas know the difference?
snowmonkey79
said on January 18, 2011
Hi guys! Great discussion. My two cents:The pressure my parents put on us did not prepare us for competitive environments, if anything it scared us away from competition because we were convinced we were talentless and worthless and because we were taught that anything less than perfection was failure, we felt we were destined for failure.Raising happy, healthy children is a challenge, but you can't beat them and bully them into being happy and healthy. This may be TMI for this forum, but after a bout of severe depression when I was a teenager, my dad was at a loss for what to do and he began smacking my face as hard as he could shouting, "Why can't you be happy!? Why can't you be happy!?" I don't mean this as an indictment of my parents. They are great people and they ultimately raised us really well. But the pressure on them to put a specific sort of pressure on us was unhealthy for us all. Kaiser and Jeremy, you guys knew me at a certain time in my life when I was really thrashing around and trying to find my identity after suppressing it to varying degrees through my teenage and college years. The booze, the ridiculous things I got away with, the prestige of being an "Arts & Entertainment Editor" at the age of 24, may have made me a bit of a brat, but it wound up being an important process in shedding the inhibitions I had as a result of my upbringing. I was being the arrogant prick I was never able to be most of my life.Now my parents come see my band play. They ask me about my paintings. They don't bat an eye when my sister says she's going to take off to the West Coast to wander around on organic farms. They see that we are happy, healthy, loving people who have great relationships with the people around them. They see that we are busy and doing what we want to do, and that's enough for them now. In fact, they're actually proud. They've recognized that by loosening up and allowing us to pursue our own interests and develop our own thoughts, they have allowed us to become interesting, multi-faceted, multi-skilled people, which is all they really wanted anyway.-gerry
msg2alex
said on January 19, 2011
As a non-Asian American that grew up in Asia, I think that while Amy Chua has some accurate points as to Chinese culture (I've seen it myself), I don't think she is at all a superior parent, or that Chinese are in general superior at anything just because they're Chinese or have strict parents.While growing up in Asia, I saw plenty of good and bad results with some childhood friends who definitely had a "Chinese mother". Kids committing suicide because their parents were impossible to please: I saw it happen. Nothing for Amy Chua to extol there. Kids crying to their teachers begging for a better grade so their parents wouldn't be angry: I saw it, and it was ridiculous.I will concede that it seems most Asian parents I knew were a lot more interested in their kids' education than the American parents I knew. That's a good thing. There are definite cultural differences that play into this that cannot be denied. My wife and I are quite attentive to our children's education, and we are seeing good fruit from that. Have yet to call them "garbage." How desperate we'd have to be to do that!I had a rather easy-going and permissive Swedish mom, and guess what, I practiced clarinet and studied multiple languages several hours a day, not because I was verbally abused (or worse) into doing so, but because I wanted to. Never had to be called garbage to know right from wrong. Sure, I got a few spankings and plenty of harsh words, but they were about my behaviors and actions, not my identity. Any parent who calls a child "garbage" is really speaking about herself. My dad wasn't around much, so maybe it's just genes I inherited that made my an industrious student....and I watched TV and had play dates and got to be in musicals. I now have a 6-figure income, a huge house, and a fascinating career. I think my parents were superior to Amy Chua, because they didn't have to goad me to be successful.I think it's pretty pathetic if a "Chinese mom" has to resort to abuse upon abuse, and all my "Swedish mom" had to do was let me be me. Go figure.I don't think Amy Chua has done anything special with her daughters that is not also accomplished by many American parents. She apparently is operating from a place of fear, while my parents and myself operate more on confidence and faith. Chua's style is probably just what she knew. Her essay and book may do well because there is still a mystique in America about Asian culture, because sadly, most Americans don't know much about Asian culture, nor do they care too.Our children (those of me and my wife) are quite smart and love to study, and we let them have play dates and watch TV. And I don't care what Amy Chua might say to that.BTW, Sinica is brilliant series. Keep up the great work!
jjwarner8403
said on May 26, 2013
What was up with the gun discussion about the incident in Arizona? It clearly had nothing to do with an actual political assassination which was evident immediately after it had occurred. Funny listening to this podcast long after the events occurred.